You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Turn on more accessible mode
Turn off more accessible mode
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Turn off Animations
Turn on Animations
ENERGY, INSTALLATIONS, & ENVIRONMENT
ENERGY, INSTALLATIONS, & ENVIRONMENT
Installations & Facilities
Assistant General Counsel
ASN EIE Policy
SECNAV Safety Excellence Awards
ASN EIE Links
Assistant General Counsel
Installations & Facilities
What is the DON strategy to managin PFC/PFAS?
How did EPA set the drinking water health advisory levels for PFOS and PFOA?
What do parts per billion (ppb) and parts per trillion(ppt) concentrations in drinking water mean in simple terms?
USES WITHIN DON/MILITARY
What is known about the possible health effects of PFC/PFAS?
What can people do to reduce the risk of exposure to PFC/PFAS?
Department of the Navy (DON) is implementing a comprehensive strategy to manage and address Perfluorinated Compounds (PFC)/Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) issues in the following areas:
Drinking water on DON installations:
DON has sampled all on-installation drinking water systems in compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR3) requirements. DON is completing sampling at remaining systems per policy by end of 2016. DON has reviewed EPA UCMR3 data for all installations that buy water from these public water systems. All installations where testing has been conducted are currently receiving safe drinking water.
Impacted public and private drinking water off installation:
DON has been proactively identifying locations where Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) or Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) may have migrated to off installation drinking water sources. Where EPA lifetime health advisory levels have been exceeded, DON has provided alternative drinking water.
DON cleanup program:
DON is conducting installation-wide assessments to identify all potential PFOA and PFOS release sites and will prioritize future site investigations and remediation based on potential risk to drinking water sources.
Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF):
DON is identifying for removal and destruction all legacy 3M® PFOS (and PFOA) containing AFFF. DON is testing current AFFF (most of which were developed to comply with the EPA 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program) to confirm chemical formulations, with the goal of identifying suitable replacements for existing stocks.
DON Policies on PFC/PFAS:
Perfluorinated Compounds (PFCs)- An Emerging Environmental Issue
Testing for Perfluorochemicals (PFCs) in Drinking Water
Perfluorinated Compounds (PFCs)- Drinking Water System Testing Requirement
Perfluorinated Compounds/Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFC/PFAS) – Identification of Potential Areas of Concern (AOCs)
Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) Control, Removal, and Disposal
What is PFC or PFAS?
Perfluorinated compounds (PFC) or perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of man-made chemicals. PFC/PFAS have been used for many years to make products that resist heat, stains, grease and water. For example, PFC/PFAS may be used to keep food from sticking to cookware, to make sofas and carpets resistant to stains, to make clothes and mattresses more waterproof, and in some food packaging, as well as in some firefighting materials. Because they help reduce friction, they are also used in a variety of other industries, including aerospace, automotive, building and construction, and electronics. Commercial and consumer products containing PFC/PFAS were first introduced in the 1950s.
What are some different terminology being used to describe PFC/PFAS?
Perfluorinated Compounds (PFCs) or perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a family of hundreds of human-made chemicals as described above. The two best known groups of this family of chemicals are the perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), which include perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and the perfluorosulfonates (PFSAs), which include perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). Other PFC/PFAS are listed in the table below.
List of Common PFC/PFAS and Their Abbreviations
to see a larger image of the chart).
How have PFC/PFAS been used?
Due to their unique properties, PFC/PFAS have been used in many industrial and consumer products. PFC/PFAS have been used to make non-stick surfaces on cookware and waterproof coatings for textiles and paper products. They are a key ingredient in many products that must flow freely, including paints, cleaning liquids, and fire-fighting foams. PFC/PFAS have been used in hundreds of ways across almost all industrial sectors, some of which are listed in the table below.
Common Uses of PFC/PFAS
to see a larger image of the chart).
Are PFC/PFAS still being produced?
PFC/ PFAS may broadly be separated into two categories: short-chain and long-chain. Long-chain PFC/PFAS, including PFOS and PFOA, contain more carbon atoms than short-chain PFC/ PFAS. In general, short-chain PFC/PFAS are still being produced worldwide, but the production of long-chain PFC/PFAS has greatly declined over the past 15 years. For example, the largest U.S. manufacturer of PFOS voluntarily stopped producing it in 2002. However, other countries still produce PFOS, and it can be imported into the United States in limited quantities. In 2006, EPA and major companies in the PFC/PFAS industry launched the 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program in which the eight leading manufacturers of PFOA agreed to a voluntary phase-out of PFOA.
As companies have stopped producing long-chain PFC/PFAS, short-chain PFC/PFAS have replaced them in many cases. Short-chain PFC/PFAS have many of the same unique properties as long-chain PFC/PFAS. Some (but not all) short-chain PFC/PFAS do not remain in the body as long as long-chain PFC/PFAS. As a result, they are thought to be a less-toxic alternative to long-chain PFC/PFAS. However, the toxicity and environmental impacts of short-chain PFC/PFAS have not been thoroughly researched, and more research is needed to demonstrate their potential effects.
What are the more commonly studied PFC/PFAS?
PFC/PFAS are a class of chemicals; 8 have been studied more than the others: PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid), PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonate), PFHxS (perfluorohexane sulfonate), PFOSA (perfluorooctane sulfonamide), PFNA (perfluorononanoate), PFDeA (perfluorodecanoate), Et-PFOSA-AcOH 2 [(N-ethyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetate], and Me-PFOSA-AcOH 2 [(N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetate]. Scientists know the most about PFOA and PFOS. Less is known about the other PFC/PFAS.
References on PFC/PFAS General Information
NIEHS PFCs Factsheet:
How EPA manages PFAS under TSCA:
USES WITHIN DON/MILITARY
What are the uses of materials that contain PFC/PFAS within the Department of the Navy (DON)?
Within DON's operations, PFC/PFAS are most commonly associated with aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used primarily for firefighting, but can also be contained in some other materials (e.g., degreaser vapor suppression) and wastes/mixed wastes. Additional information is provided below regarding release mechanisms..
What are the advantages of AFFF?
Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) is used for extinguishing Class B (flammable liquid) fuel fires. A key feature is the formation of an aqueous film with low surface tension between the foam layer and the fuel surface that prevents the escape of flammable vapors. The film and foam layers work in combination to exclude oxygen from the fuel surface, and the water content of the foam provides a cooling effect.
What are the advantages of Military Specification (MILSPEC) AFFF over non-MILSPEC AFFF?
Some of the advantages of MILSPEC AFFF include: quicker fire extinguishment times; a requirement for compatibility with both seawater and freshwater; performance requirements for half and quintuple strength tests (for demonstrated viability when incorrectly proportioning); and the capability to intermix MILSPEC AFFFs from different manufacturers. However both MILSPEC and non-MILSPEC AFFF have contained PFOS and PFOA.
Why does the Navy and Marine Corps use Military Specification (MILSPEC) aqueous film forming foam (AFFF)?
MILSPEC qualified AFFF was developed specifically to rapidly extinguish Class B fires where shipboard/aviation fuels and ordnance may be present in critical fire scenarios such as flight decks and where aircraft movement, fueling, and weapons loading occur in very close proximity. The allowable times for fire extinguishment are much more stringent for a MILSPEC AFFF than a non-MILSPEC (i.e. UL 162 qualified) AFFF. One example is the 50 square feet pan fire test where a MILSPEC AFFF is required to extinguish the fire in 50 seconds, but a UL162 non-MILSPEC AFFF is allowed 180 seconds.
What types/classes of AFFF extinguishing agent(s) are currently specified and available?
Military Specification (MILSPEC) AFFF is currently specified and available in two types (3% and 6%). 3% is intended to be mixed 3 parts concentrate to 97 parts water. 6% is intended to be mixed 6 parts concentrate to 94 parts water.
Does DON still use AFFF that contains PFOS and/or PFOA?
3M® ceased manufacturing AFFF with PFOS (this formulation also included about 1-2% PFOA) in 2002. However, legacy 3M® AFFF remains in some DON systems and inventory. DON is in the process of identifying these locations and preparing to remove this AFFF for proper disposal/destruction. AFFF produced after 2002 may also contain PFOA and/or precursor PFC/PFAS, which can degrade to PFOA. DON is in the process of testing the newest formulations of AFFF, which were developed to comply with the EPA 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program, to verify whether there are trace amounts of PFOA and, if so, at what level. Once PFOA-level compliant formulations can be identified and certified to meet MILSPEC performance criteria, old stocks will be replaced with these newer formulations.
RELEASES AND BEHAVIOR OF PFC/PFAS IN THE ENVIRONMENT
What are the uses of materials that contain PFC/PFAS within the DON?
The primary release mechanisms of PFC/PFAS to the environment within DON's operations consist of uses, non-point and point source releases such as spills and leaks, training activities, emergency responses, and testing of PFC/PFAS containing material and wastes. Potential release mechanisms of PFC/PFAS into the environment include:
Uses of AFFF containing PFC/PFAS in the following activities:
Firefighting and crash response vehicle testing where AFFF is discharged and not completely collected for proper disposal
Fire training exercises such as flooding a fire pit or other built facility or structure with flammable liquids (e.g., jet fuel), igniting the fluids, and subsequently extinguishing the fire with AFFF where the liquid is not completely contained and collected for proper disposal
Crash crew training exercises where releases occur from spraying AFFF at training sites and the liquid is not completely contained and collected for proper disposal
Hangar system operations, testing, and flooding; releases may occur from improper capture and disposal of AFFF in and around the hangars where the foam migrated to and was thus released the ground or into draining channels or ditches
Responses to class B or fuel fires or spills and there was no containment of the liquids for proper disposal
Emergency response actions such as crash sites (aircraft, vehicle, and others)
Uses of material containing PFC/PFAS in the following industrial operation:
Plating shops - PFC/PFAS are sometimes contained in materials used in the vapor suppression system; releases could result from improper capture or disposal of material around floor drains, foundation cracks, and outdoor soil or ditch areas
Storage, handling, or disposal of PFC/PFAS contained in AFFF and materials or wastes:
Release from improper filling of storage tanks, firefighting trucks, or crash response vehicles
Release from spills and leaks from storage tanks and piping
Releases from landfills or burn areas where the materials or wastes were/are disposed
SAMPLING AND IMPACT TO DRINKING WATER WITHIN DON
How many installations throughout the DON have sampled for PFOA and PFOS in the U.S.?
Per EPA Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR3) requirements, Navy was required to sample at 17 installations and Marine Corps was required to sample at 7 installations within the United States. None of the following systems exceeded the EPA Health Advisory (HA) for PFOS and PFOA:
Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam - HI
Naval Base Guam - GU
Naval Support Activity (NSA) Norfolk Naval Shipyard - VA
Naval Station (NAVSTA) Norfolk - VA
Naval Station (NAVSTA) Great Lakes - IL
Joint Expeditionary Base (JEB) Little Creek-Fort Story West - VA
Naval Air Station (NAS) Patuxent River - MD
NSA Washington - DC (Navy Yard)
Joint Base Anacostia - Bolling - DC
Naval Base Kitsap - Bangor - WA
Naval Base Kitsap - Bremerton - WA
Naval Air Station (NAS) Whidbey Island - WA
NAS Jacksonville - FL
NAS Pensacola - FL
NAVSTA Mayport - FL
NAS Lemoore - CA
Naval Construction Battalion Center (NCBC) Port Hueneme - CA
Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Pendleton - Camp Pendleton (North and South)-CA
Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point - Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point-NC
MCB Hawaii - Marine Corps Base Hawaii-HI
MCB Quantico - Quantico Marine Base Mainside-VA
MCB Camp Lejeune - USMC Lejeune (Hadnot Point and Holcomb Blvd) - NC
MCAS New River - USMC Lejeune New River Air Station-NC
Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC) Twentynine Palms - USMC Twentynine Palms-CA
The individual results can be found on EPA's website:
DON policy further required sampling at installations where there was a known or suspected release of PFC/PFAS with a potential to impact drinking water sources. This required Navy to sample 10 additional installations and Marine Corps to sample 1 additional installation within the United States.
NAS Oceana - VA (Naval Auxiliary Landing Field (NALF) Fentress )
Weapon Station (WPNSTA) Earle Colts Neck (MSC Fire School) - NJ
Naval Shipyard (NSY) Portsmouth - NH (NAA Cutler - ME)
NSA South Potomac - VA (Naval Surface Warfare Center Division (NAVSURFWARCENDIV) Dahlgren)
Naval Station (NAVSTA) Great Lakes - IL
Naval Base Kitsap - WA (NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV KEYPORT)
NSA Mid-South - TN
NAS Kingsville - TX
NAS Whiting Field Milton - FL
NAS Whiting Field Milton (Naval Outlying Field Choctaw) - FL
NCBC Gulfport - MS
Marine Corps Logistic Base (MCLB) Albany-GA
Only NALF Fentress had PFOA or PFOS detected above the EPA lifetime HA in drinking water and alternative water was immediately provided upon receipt of sample results. Earle Colts Neck (MSC Fire School) had PFC/PFAS detected in ground water monitoring wells associated with an environmental restoration site, but not in the Navy drinking water supply.
Where does DON's past use of PFC/PFAS currently impact public and/or private drinking water system/wells?
DON is currently mitigating the PFC/PFAS drinking water contamination at two BRAC installations (Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base, Willow Grove, and Naval Air Warfare Center, Warminster, PA) and two active installations (NALF Fentress and Earle Colts Neck). If drinking water exposures exceed the HAs, DON immediately eliminates the exposure by disconnecting the affected system and providing an alternate drinking water (new connection or bottled water).
DON is managing the long-term mitigation of the contamination source areas under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Department of Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP), and the Navy Environmental Restoration Program (NERP), similar to other regulated contaminants.
Further details on DON's actions at the affected installations can be found in the "Additional Resources" Section under the
"DON SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION"
What are the regulatory standards for PFC/PFAS?
Currently, PFC/PFAS are classified as unregulated or "emerging" contaminants, which have no Safe Drinking Water Act (SWDA) regulatory standards or routine water quality testing requirements. PFC/PFAS are being studied by the EPA to determine if regulation is needed. On 19 May 2016, the EPA's Office of Water issued health advisory levels (HAs) for two PFC/PFAS, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) - Publication EPA 822-R-16-004 and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) - EPA 822-R-16-005. Health advisory levels are not regulatory standards. They are health based concentrations above which the EPA recommends action should be taken to reduce exposure. The EPA HA levels are 0.07 parts per billion (ppb) for both PFOS and PFOA, individually or as the sum of the two.
For more information on how EPA manages the unregulated or "emerging" contaminants refer to: UCMR -
Drinking water health advisory for PFOS and PFOA -
What are health advisory levels?
Health advisory levels identify the concentration of a contaminant in drinking water at and below which adverse health effects are not anticipated to occur over specific exposure durations (e.g., 1 day, 10 days, a lifetime). HAs serve as informal technical guidance to assist federal, state, and local officials, and managers of public or community water systems in protecting public health when emergency spills or other contamination situations occur. An HA document provides information on the environmental properties, health effects, analytical methodology, and treatment technologies for removing drinking water contaminants.
How did EPA set the drinking water health advisory levels for PFOS and PFOA?
EPA used a factor called the Relative Source Contribution (RSC) in calculating the lifetime health advisory levels for PFOS and PFOA to account for non-water exposures. From a national perspective, the dominant source of human exposure to PFOS and PFOA is expected to be from the diet (food and water); indoor dust from carpets and other sources is also an important source of exposure, especially for children. The HA was calculated using a RSC of 20%, which allows for other PFOS and PFOA exposure sources (e.g., dust, diet, air) to make up 80% of an individual's exposure to these compounds. More information on the EPA method for calculating a health advisory level is available from the EPA Document EPA-822-B-00-004, Methodology for Deriving Ambient Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health 2000, October 2000 and the EPA's Webpage for Drinking Water Health Advisory for PFOS and PFOA (
What do parts per billion (ppb) and parts per trillion (ppt) concentrations in drinking water mean in simple terms?
Parts per billion (ppb) and parts per trillion (ppt) are the most commonly used terms to describe very small amounts or trace levels of contaminants in our drinking water.
One ppb is the equivalent of one drop of impurity in 500 barrels of water or 1 cent out of $10 million.
One ppt is the equivalent of one drop of impurity in 500,000 barrels of water or traveling 6 inches out of a 93 million-mile journey toward the sun.
Are there advisory numbers for other PFC/PFAS (except PFOA and PFOS)?
While EPA does not have health advisory levels for other PFC/PFAS, there are some states that have developed screening levels.
How do PFC/PFAS behave in our body?
Because of their widespread use, most people in the United States have some PFC/PFAS in their body. PFC/PFAS are not stored in body fat. Once the PFC/PFAS are in a person's body, it takes about two to four years before those PFC/PFAS levels go down by half, even if no more is taken in.
More information is available from ATSDR.
Why are PFC/PFAS of possible concern?
Since their introduction in the late 1940s, PFC/PFAS have entered and spread throughout the environment. Many PFC/PFAS, including PFOS and PFOA, breakdown very slowly in the environment and can travel long distances over time. PFOS, PFOA, and other PFC/PFAS have been found in animals in the Arctic and Antarctic, far removed from known sources of the chemicals. Because of their frequent use and presence in the environment, most people in the United States and in the industrialized world have measurable amounts of PFC/PFAS in their blood (at levels measured in micrograms per liter (ug/l)). In addition, PFOS, PFOA and other PFC/PFAS can build up and remain in the human body. Once in the body, it can take a long time for them to leave. As a result of this bio-persistence and widespread detection, many people are concerned about the potential impacts of PFC/PFAS on human health. Research is currently ongoing to evaluate the potential health impacts of PFOS, PFOA, and other PFC/PFAS. In many animal studies, exposure to PFC/PFAS has been shown to cause changes in the function of the liver, thyroid, pancreas, and hormone levels. The impacts of PFC/PFAS in humans are less well understood and considered uncertain, though studies of exposed populations have shown possible links between PFC/PFAS and some harmful health effects.
What is known about the possible health effects of PFC/PFAS?
Scientists are not sure about the possible health effects of human exposure to PFC/PFAS. PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA have been more widely studied than other PFC/PFAS. For the most part, studies have found that animals exposed to PFC/PFAS have shown changes in the function of the liver, thyroid, pancreas, and hormone levels. However, scientists are not sure how animal data applies to human exposure, because PFC/PFAS behave differently in humans than they do in animals and may be harmful in different ways.
Amounts of PFC/PFAS build up and remain in the human body and the amount reduces very slowly over time. So scientists and doctors are concerned about their effects on human health. While the evidence is inconclusive, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) some studies in humans have shown that certain PFC/PFAS may be associated with developmental delays in the fetus and child, including possible changes in growth, learning, and behavior; decreased fertility and changes to the body's natural hormones; increased cholesterol, changes to the immune system; increased uric acid levels; changes in liver enzymes; and prostate, kidney, and testicular cancer. More research is needed to confirm or rule out possible links between health outcomes of potential concern and exposure to PFC/PFAS.
Additional references are available at:
More Questions on Health Effects
How likely are PFC/PFAS to cause cancer?
Researchers and regulators continue to evaluate the likelihood of PFC/PFAS causing cancer. Neither the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) nor the National Toxicology Program has made a final statement about the ability of any PFC/PFAS to cause cancer. However, both agencies are currently evaluating the cancer potential of PFOA. EPA is evaluating the cancer potential of PFOS. ATSDR and EPA have identified possible association of certain PFC/PFAS with prostate, kidney, and testicular cancer.
Additional references are available at:
What do we know about the effect of PFC/PFAS mixtures?
At this time, there is not enough information to evaluate the health effects of exposures to mixtures of PFC/PFAS. We do not currently know how mixtures of PFC/PFAS may interact with the body, and few studies have compared the health effects of different mixtures of PFC/PFAS.
What are the potential health effects of PFC/PFAS exposure in children?
Over the past few years, researchers have begun to examine the possible effects of PFC/PFAS exposures in children. Studies have shown that newborns can be exposed to PFC/PFAS through breast milk. Young children may be exposed to PFC/PFAS through food and water, similarly to adults. In addition, young children have a higher risk of exposure to PFC/PFAS through carpet cleaners and similar products, due to time spent lying and crawling on floors in their early years. As a result, most children in industrialized nations have at least some level of PFC/PFAS in their blood.
Researchers are studying whether childhood PFC/PFAS exposures may be linked to effects on the immune system, asthma, and behavioral effects. However, as with studies in adults, the evidence linking PFC/PFAS to health effects in children is inconclusive. Researchers acknowledge that the findings of many of the studies linking PFC/PFAS and health effects in children are limited and that more studies are needed. As a result, it is too soon to state whether or not there are special concerns for children.
If my child is sick, who will take responsibility? How do I get my child help?
For questions about health care, you should consult your health care provider.
I drank the water, will I get sick?
ATSDR says they cannot predict whether or not you will get sick. Whether someone will or will not develop health problems from exposure to any contaminant depends on several factors, including:
How much exposure you received,
How long you were exposed,
When you were exposed (e.g., as a fetus, a child, or an adult),
Any other exposures to environmental or occupational hazards you have received during your lifetime,
Your lifestyle-for example, your diet, your tobacco or alcohol use, and your physical activity,
Illness you may have had from other causes, and
Medications you have taken during your lifetime.
References on PFC/PFAS Health Effects
EXPOSURE AND BIOMONITORING
How are people exposed to PFC/PFAS?
PFC/PFAS are man-made, so there are no natural sources in the environment. However, higher environmental levels of PFC/PFAS can be found near areas where they are manufactured or where products containing PFC/PFAS are often used. PFC/PFAS can travel long distances, move through soil, seep into groundwater, or be carried through air. Because they are stable chemicals and move so easily in the environment, PFC/PFAS have been found in soil, sediment, and water samples far away from where they were made or used. Potential sources of PFC/PFAS in the environment may include industrial sources, areas where PFC/PFAS are used frequently, and consumer products. Listed below are places where they can be found.
Public water systems and drinking water wells, soil, and outdoor air near industrial sources or areas with frequent PFC/PFAS use.
Indoor air in spaces that contain carpets, textiles and other consumer products treated with PFC/PFAS to resist stains.
Surface water (lakes, ponds, etc.) and run-off from areas where aqueous (water-based) film-forming firefighting foam (AFFF) is often used, such as military or civilian airfields.
Locally caught fish from contaminated bodies of water.
Food items sold in the marketplace.
Consuming contaminated food and water is thought to be the main way people are exposed to PFC/PFAS. PFC/PFAS have been measured in waterbodies used for drinking water around the world, and PFC/PFAS have been found in a variety of commercial food items. Other potential sources of PFC/PFAS include everyday items such as non-stick coatings on cookware, grease-resistant paper used for foods, and stain resistant coatings on carpets, upholstery, and other fabrics. However PFOA and PFOS are no longer used in most of these products. Due to their ability to build up in the body, even small amounts of PFC/PFAS consumed regularly can result in measurable levels of PFC/PFAS in exposed people.
Workers involved in making or processing PFC/PFAS are likely to be exposed to more PFC/PFAS than the general population. Workers may be exposed to PFC/PFAS by inhaling them, getting them on their skin, and swallowing them; however, inhalation is the most likely route for exposure.
Additional information on exposure to PFC/PFAS can be found at:
Is my drinking water safe if it comes from a private well?
Private wells can be contaminated with PFC/PFAS. If your water contains PFOA and PFOS, you can reduce exposure by using an alternative or treated water source for drinking, food preparation, cooking, brushing teeth, and any activity that might result in ingestion of water. ATSDR has stated that: routine showering or bathing will not likely cause a significant exposure; studies have shown very limited absorption of PFC/PFAS through the skin; and, many PFC/PFAS including PFOS and PFOA are essentially non-volatile, such that inhalation while bathing or showering is not likely to be a major pathway.
Are there PFC/PFAS in foods?
Various studies have examined the concentrations of PFC/PFAS in different food items available for purchase in the marketplace. Items in which PFC/PFAS have been detected include potatoes, canned vegetables, eggs, sugars, preserved foods, beef, fish, milk, and microwave popcorn. PFC/PFAS can be transferred to vegetables and other plants from contaminated soil and water, though the uptake, distribution, and storage properties of individual plants can vary. Cattle, poultry, and other animals can be exposed through the consumption of feed contaminated with PFC/PFAS or through the ingestion of contaminated drinking water, which in turn can lead to the contamination of food items produced from these animals. In addition, the non-stick coatings on many items used to cook or store food may function as a source of PFC/PFAS contamination in prepared foods.
The consumption of fish is thought to be a major pathway for PFC/PFAS exposure for both the general population and for people living near PFAS contaminated waters. Typically, elevated concentrations of PFC/PFAS in fish are found near areas involved in the production or manufacture of PFC/PFAS. Before consuming recreationally caught fish in these areas, please consult local fish and seafood advisories.
More Questions on Exposure and Biomonitoring
Is it safe to swim in municipal pools or recreational waters?
Currently, there is insufficient information to assess whether recreational exposures to PFC/PFAS-contaminated waters are harmful to human health. Many PFC/PFAS including PFOS and PFOA are essentially non-volatile, such that inhalation while swimming or bathing is not likely to be a major pathway. In the interim, anyone with concerns about exposure to PFC/PFAS in surface water should consult with their appropriate state agencies.
What is being done to prevent the risk of exposure to PFC/PFAS?
The greatest source of exposure reduction to the general population has come from the voluntary phase-out of many PFC/PFAS by the companies that produce them. The first voluntary reduction came from the 3M® Company in 2002, when they agreed to stop the production of PFOS and related chemicals. Later, the eight leading manufacturers of PFOA agreed to a voluntary phase-out of PFOA through the EPA's 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program. Both of these programs have contributed to a significant reduction in PFC/PFAS levels (particularly PFOS) in the blood of the general population since the early 2000s.
At specific locations, many sites contaminated with PFC/PFAS are being treated and monitored for the risk of further contaminant movement. Other efforts have focused on increasing awareness of PFC/PFAS contamination and on ways to reduce the risk of exposure. For instance, health departments in Minnesota, Michigan, Alabama, and other states have issued "Do not eat" fish advisories for fish caught from PFC/PFAS-contaminated waterways. In addition, a variety of state and federal agencies are informing the public about PFC/PFAS contamination through public service announcements and other messaging.
Are there methods to show whether people have been exposed to PFC/PFAS?
Various methods are available for testing if people have been exposed to PFC/PFAS. One method, known as biomonitoring, involves measuring how much of a chemical is present in the human body. Levels of a contaminant in the body suggest that some level of exposure occurred, but biomonitoring cannot determine which exposure(s) caused the chemical to be present. Moreover, the presence of chemicals in the blood or other body tissue does not automatically mean that harmful health effects will occur. Scientists do not currently know whether and at what common levels of exposure many contaminants, including PFC/PFAS, in the blood could lead to harmful effects.
More information on biomonitoring can be found at:
Should people concerned about exposures to PFC/PFAS get themselves tested?
ATSDR does not advise individuals to be tested for PFC/PFAS exposure. Although specific PFC/PFAS can be measured in serum (blood), the measurements must be done in specialized laboratories and are expensive. Further, a serum PFC/PFAS concentration does not provide diagnostic or treatment information, and cannot predict future health effects. It does not indicate when exposure occurred or the source of the exposure, although it may be suggestive.
It is important to keep in mind that most Americans have serum concentrations of one or more specific PFC/PFAS, including PFOS and PFOA.
What can people do to reduce their risk of exposure to PFC/PFAS?
PFC/PFAS are found in the blood of people and animals all over the world and are present at low levels in a variety of food products and in the environment (air, water, soil, etc.). Therefore, completely preventing exposure to PFC/PFAS is unrealistic, and no effective recommendations can be made for entirely reducing individual exposures in the general population. However, if you live near known sources of PFC/PFAS contamination, you can take steps to reduce your risk of exposure to PFC/PFAS.
For example, numerous states have issued advisories cautioning consumers to either stop or limit eating fish from waters contaminated with PFOS or other PFC/PFAS. Check with your state public health and environmental quality departments for any advisories in place in your area and to learn the types and local sources of fish that are safe to eat.
If your water contains PFOA and PFOS, you can reduce exposure by using an alternative water source for drinking, food preparation, cooking, brushing teeth, and any activity that might result in ingestion of water. ATSDR has stated that routine showering or bathing in this water should not be a problem. Studies have shown very limited absorption of PFC/PFAS through the skin. Many PFC/ PFAS including PFOS and PFOA are essentially non-volatile, such that inhalation while bathing or showering is not likely to be a major pathway.
A variety of consumer products, including non-stick coatings on cookware and coatings on clothing, carpets, and paper packaging, have contained different types of PFC/PFAS in the past. While recent efforts to remove long-chain PFC/PFAS from many of these products have reduced the likelihood of exposure to long-chain PFAS, exposure to short-chain PFC/PFAS may still be possible through modern consumer products.
You can contact CDC/ATSDR for updated information on this topic at 1-800-CDC-INFO. If you have questions or concerns about the products you use in your home, contact the Consumer Product Safety Commission at (800) 638-2772.
Is it safe to take a shower or bath?
ATSDR has stated that routine showering or bathing will not likely cause a significant exposure. Studies have shown very limited absorption of PFC/PFAS through the skin. Many PFC/PFAS including PFOS and PFOA are essentially non-volatile, such that inhalation while bathing or showering is not likely to be a major pathway.
Should I filter my tap water before drinking?
ATSDR does not currently recommend any specific point-of-use filters for drinking water because the effectiveness and proper use of these devices has not been established. If your water contains PFOA and PFOS at a combined level that exceed the health advisory levels of 0.07 ppb , you can reduce exposure by using an alternative water source for drinking, food preparation, cooking, brushing teeth, and any activity that might result in ingestion of water.
Should I drink bottled water?
If your water contains PFOA and PFOS, you may reduce exposure by using an alternative water source for drinking, food preparation, cooking, brushing teeth, and any activity that might result in ingestion of water. However, bottled water is not tested for the presence of PFC/PFAS, so we don't know if PFC/PFAS may be present in these sources as well.
Can I do laundry and wash dishes with tap water?
Yes. Doing laundry or washing dishes is not likely to pose a significant exposure to PFC/PFAS. Currently, there are no medical interventions that will remove PFC/PFAS from the body. The best intervention is to stop the source of exposure.
Is there treatment for people who have been exposed to PFC/PFAS?
ATSDR does not recommend any specific treatments for people who have been exposed to PFC/PFAS. If PFC/PFAS are detected in your water, or if you or family members have signs or symptoms that you think are caused by PFC/PFAS exposure, discuss your concerns with your family's health care provider.
How do I eliminate PFC/PFAS from my body if I have been exposed?
Currently, there are no medical interventions that will remove PFC/PFAS from the body. The best intervention is to stop the source of exposure.
If I am pregnant, is it safe to drink tap water?
If the EPA's Long Term Health Advisory levels are exceeded, pregnant women may wish to seek an alternative drinking water source until levels of PFOA and PFOS in the drinking water are reduced. You can reduce exposure by using an alternative water source for drinking, food preparation, cooking, brushing teeth, and any activity that might result in ingestion of water.
If I am pregnant, should I filter my tap water before drinking?
ATSDR does not currently recommend any specific point-of-use filters for drinking water because the effectiveness and proper use of these devices has not been established. If your water contains PFOA or PFOS, you can reduce exposure by using an alternative water source for drinking, food preparation, cooking, brushing teeth, and any activity that might result in ingestion of water.
If I am pregnant should I only drink bottled water?
If the EPA's Long Term Health Advisory levels are exceeded, pregnant women may wish to seek an alternative drinking water source until levels of PFOA and PFOS in the drinking water are reduced. You can reduce exposure by using an alternative water source for drinking, food preparation, cooking, brushing teeth, and any activity that might result in ingestion of water. Bottled water is not tested for the presence of PFC/PFAS.
Is it safe to breastfeed?
Breastfeeding is linked with numerous health benefits for both infants and mothers. The science on the health effects of PFC/PFAS for mothers and babies is evolving. According to ATSDR "Human breast milk may contribute to the exposure of infants to PFAS since these substances have been detected in human breast milk." To better weigh the risks and benefits of breastfeeding, please talk to your child's pediatrician.
I am using powdered formula to feed my baby, is it safe to use tap water to mix the formula or should I use bottled water?
If the EPA's Long Term Health Advisory levels are exceeded, caregivers preparing bottles for infants should seek an alternative water source, or use formula that does not require adding water until levels of PFOA and PFOS in the drinking water are reduced. You can reduce exposure by using an alternative source for drinking, food preparation, cooking, and any activity that might result in ingestion of water. Please note that bottled water is not routinely tested for the presence of PFC/PFAS.
References on What To Do If You Have Been Exposed?
WHAT FEDERAL ACTION IS BEING TAKEN?
What Federal Agencies are conducting actions related to PFC/PFAS?
The U.S.EPA, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), the National Toxicology Program (NTP), the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), among others, are jointly or individually conducting various studies and researches associated with health effects of PFCs/PFAS.
Information and resources on PFC/PFAS can be found on:
(Draft ATSDR profile of the toxicity of PFOS and PFOA),
How many public water systems will this effect for systems that service more than 10,000 people?
Based on preliminary evaluation of the Third Unregulated Contaminated Monitoring Rule (UCMR3) database, EPA indicated that approximately 63 municipal water systems to have concentrations of PFOA and PFOS above 0.07 ug/L.
Will public water systems that serve less than 10,000 people have PFOS + PFOA (combined) concentrations that exceed a reference value of 70 parts per trillion (ppt; 0.070 micrograms per liter)?
Smaller water systems may have detections of PFOA and PFOS that exceed the 0.07 ug/L health advisory level. This is especially true for systems near identified sources.